Pros
Highly micromanaged environment with unclear ownership and unsustainable work expectations
Cons
Everything. Nothing is pros here.
Lets start:
I worked here for a short period and the experience was nothing but toxic means toxic due to the overall work structure and management style.
The work culture was heavily micromanaged, extending beyond reasonable oversight into constant interference in execution-level decisions such as task allocation and internal communication.
There was very limited autonomy, and even standard decisions were frequently questioned, creating a highly controlled and stressful environment.
Some senior folks understood themselves as Gods like chief of wow and project managers questioning your accountability and involvement in day-to-day operations was excessive and often inconsistent, leading to unclear ownership, overlapping authority, and confusion in responsibilities. Instead of empowering teams, decision-making was concentrated and frequently shifted, which impacted execution efficiency.
There was a lack of structured workflows and defined communication systems.
Most coordination happened through informal WA channels, which resulted in ambiguity, reactive execution, and unclear expectations.
The working schedule was demanding, including all week work with limited flexibility around public holidays. This made work-life balance extremely difficult to maintain.
A significant portion of the workforce operated in a freelance or contractual setup, which created inconsistencies in accountability, expectations, and overall employee experience.
Overall, while the role provided exposure to a fast-paced environment, the lack of structure, autonomy, and sustainable work practices made it unsuitable for long-term engagement.