employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Kentucky Humane Society

Is this your company?

Rewarding work, not rewarding pay - Anonymous employee Kentucky Humane Society Employee Review

4.0
30 Apr 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

KHS has a wonderful mission and is full of hard working, dedicated people. They do a lot for the animals in the community and rural areas of the state with transport partners, spay/neuter clinic/low-cost vet clinic and multiple adoption locations around the city. They are constantly growing and adapting to the needs of the community. If you can patiently wait out the low paying positions they do offer a lot of promotion from within and most positions have several levels of growth opportunity.

Cons

KHS houses and helps thousands of animals every year but yet they are not staffed anywhere near what is needed to be a progressive shelter or provide ultimate care for the animals and people they serve or their staff. Other shelters that compare in size and programs have at least twice the staff of KHS. Staff have more duties than they can manage because of this and they get easily burnt out and stressed so turnover is high. The pay is low on almost all levels except upper management, especially in comparison to the workload.

Explore other reviews about Kentucky Humane Society

5.0
31 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Constant improvements for the animals and community.

Cons

Compassion fatigue, turnover, emotional work

1.0
5 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I'm not really sure anymore.

Cons

Over the past few years, my experience at this workplace has unfortunately taken a negative turn, evolving into what I would now characterize as a highly toxic environment. This is a stark contrast to my initial positive experience, as I previously found this to be a workplace I genuinely enjoyed. The primary driver of this deterioration is a perceived disparity in the treatment of employees, which appears to be significantly influenced by a system of favoritism within management. This has manifested in several concerning ways that have negatively impacted morale and productivity. Firstly, there has been an inequitable distribution of workload. Certain individuals are consistently assigned a disproportionately large number of tasks. For instance, I have observed instances where a single employee is solely responsible for cleaning a substantial number of kennels across multiple areas of the facility, even when other staff members appear to have the capacity to assist. Secondly, there seems to be a lack of adequate support and accommodation for employee health concerns. Instances have occurred where health-related absences have resulted in disciplinary action, indicating a concerning lack of understanding or flexibility regarding legitimate medical needs. Finally, communication practices are inconsistent and often appear to be prioritized for a select group of employees. This inconsistent flow of information and perceived preferential treatment further contributes to the toxic atmosphere. This shift in the work environment has led to a growing concern that financial considerations may have become the overriding priority, potentially at the expense of employee well-being and, more concerningly, the optimal care of the animals. Given these significant challenges and the deeply negative impact they have had on the overall work experience over the last few years, I can no longer recommend this workplace as a desirable place of employment in its current state.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All