Good for trraining, Superb Campus and facilities. Extremly poor resource management. Only talks of values. - System Engineer Infosys Employee Review

2.0
21 Mar 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good Campus. Good Learning opportnities. Superb facilities. Long term onsite opportunities, but only after 4-5 years of working in the company. Good for freshers to join,and then join later at a senior post.

Cons

Extremly slow growth. Concept of CRR is not approved by 90% of employees. Compulsary 9.25 hrs of average working hours. Only 15 paid leaves in a year. Very poor resource management.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
27 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working for the manufacturing client

Cons

Currently didn't observed any Cons.

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All