Awful UK Consulting Company - Analyst Infosys Employee Review

1.0
20 Dec 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

none, the company does not care about junior staff (consultant/analyst). Senior leadership see you as a number and are not invested nor motivated for your development. Many junior members leave within one year.

Cons

Managers do not care about junior staff, they will leave you on bench or give you menial tasks once you're on a project. The company does not have a broad range of clients, instead each division is anchored by 2 or 3 major clients from which most business is driven. This lead to an asymetrical relationship where the client will take Infosys for advantage but also means that your exposure to different clients is limited. No strategy work, almost entirely executional. Partners are only interested in achieving their KPIs and do not care about junior development or morale. Traning is almost non existent and usually 'in house'. Compensation is poor and does not rise significantly with promotions.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
22 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible working, good support for up-skilling.

Cons

It pays really low as compare to the markets.

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All