Work remotely is great, but the only motivation. - Analytics Engineering IBM Employee Review

2.0
6 Apr 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work. Customers continue (blindly) to purchase whatever IBM will sell them without question. If these $bil dollar customers only knew what they were throwing their money at.

Cons

As most have already stated, the management chain at IBM is deplorable. From execs to senior to middle to junior management, without fail they have ALL been placed there as a level of their incompetency. Execs are not technical and have no idea what IT does. Most are psychologists, HR types, or from Social systems. Problem employees that can't be dealt with legally are often promoted to some level of management, and given new subordinates to manage. Problem junior/middle managers typically find a director or a VP to cling to, and spend the rest of their lives kissing their butts to keep their jobs. They provide no leadership, no forward thinking, and certainly no one that can be approached for some meaningful insight. These are truly incompetent people, and the company is full of them - upwards of 45% of the world employee pool is management. Management is does not and is not supposed to produce ANYTHING. Except that phone call that you've been laid off or a bad PBC review. The mood/tone at IBM is just awful, and every day we look for the proberbial email of a 2 week notice. Approaching your first line manager is pointless and often backfires into an RA or a poor PBC rating. Poor PBCs have tripled in the last 2 years, using this tool to eradicate older and other "miscreant" work staff. Most are fired within 12 months in advance of retirement. IBM only retired several employees last year, all of them were from the management ranks. And yes, everything you hear on the news RE execs robbing the place blind in the $millions is true. It's an IT company that's BSing it's way through new technologies - and most know it

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
15 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Will open many doors for you career wise. Tons to learn

Cons

Large company can be slow at times

4.0
26 Aug 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All