employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Health Research And Analysis

Is this your company?

The Peter Principle At Its Finest - Anonymous employee Health Research And Analysis Employee Review

1.0
11 Dec 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The excellent staff members. They are the finest, intelligent hard-working people I have ever had the privilege of working with. Without them I would not have stayed past the first two weeks.

Cons

I have never provided public input about a company or manager with whom I have worked in all my years. However, I am compelled to provide a warning to others who may be thinking about a position (not a career) with this company. There are many problems with the organization and all can be traced back to Senior Management. First of course is the style of management. If you look in Webster's Dictionary for Micro Management the first entry will be this company. However, you cant' say just micro management is the problem. The senior management doesn't have a clue on how to manage/supervise people in general and highly skilled and trained personnel in particular. The staff are all Master's level and above and know what they need to do. However, they have been treated as children. Let me rephrase, because no one would treat their children this poorly. I thought that after a few weeks into my position or perhaps a couple of months, it would be different but it just got worse. As an example, what senior manager focuses on the color of a line versus the content of the document. Sure you want consistency and you want the document to look good but the focus has to be on the content. Senior Management is best described as irrational with a touch of paranoia. They don't trust nor believe that the employees will do a good job. For those of you who understand management theory senior management at this company believe in McGregor's Theory X. I don't like writing this. I really take no enjoyment. I know that managing a company and the people are one of the most difficult endeavors in the business world. People are very different and it takes understanding and empathy to be a good boss. Sadly there is no understanding or empathy from senior management at this company. I wish that senior management at this company would read some of the comments made on this website and step back and think that possibly, just possibly, that they have a significant problem when it comes to managing a company or it's people. I truly believe that most people can change. I hope that senior management in this organization is able to do that. If not, nothing will improve, people will come and go and the business will never grow. People make a company. They need to understand that and currently they do not!

Explore other reviews about Health Research And Analysis

5.0
6 Dec 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- immersive, hands-on opportunities to learn and grow in the emerging fields of healthcare analytics and health services research - interesting projects using large and complex medical and pharmacy datasets - employer recognizes and rewards leadership potential - community-oriented office environment - reliable and dedicated coworkers - commitment to rigorous analyses - woman-owned business

Cons

Planned project timelines are often subject to change, and flexibility is required to accommodate disruptions in workflow.

2.0
5 Aug 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Chance to work with smart and dedicated analysts • Decent benefits package for a small company • Ability to work on multiple projects and gain valuable experience rapidly • Very interesting projects • Physically comfortable office space

Cons

• Very difficult to work with management on day to day basis due to micromanaging style. Managers would check in frequently on small tasks, even as often as 3-4 times per day, even about selecting colors for spreadsheet tables. • Expectations were constantly changing – far beyond the iterative nature of analyses. • Employees’ input into discussions was not valued or utilized unless that input was in agreement with management. • Experienced a revolving door of employees. • Analysts had limited interaction with clients. • Management talked a lot about company values – transparency, integrity – but it rarely felt like these principles were being put into practice by the managers themselves. • Efforts to encourage morale and excitement among the analysts felt forced because of the lack of effort to make actual changes to project processes and practices.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All