Skin color bias Department - Electro-mechanical Technician Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
15 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good place to train in technical skills. Good safety awareness company. Roles were allocated accordingly to scope. Minimal ad-hoc or out of scope task.

Cons

Terrible bias toward skin color by PGL. If you get into his wrong side and didn’t bother to lick his boot. You’re going to suffer , he is going to turn in to blind eye toward your contribution, and once you make a mistake , he is going to make it a topic to get rid of you. Under constant pressure from him and have to keep your eye wide open. Maybe add one more eyes on your back. Colleague is very supportive and understand our feud , back me up always,

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
12 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Teaches the fundamentals of the oil and gas industry.

Cons

Sometimes knowing the direction of the project is difficult.

1.0
22 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Halliburton looks strong on the outside, especially on a resume, and the brand name still carries weight in the industry. Some teams work on interesting projects, and if you get a fair manager, you can learn a lot about large-scale B2B operations.

Cons

If you land under the wrong manager, performance improvement plans (PIPs) can be used as a weapon, not a coaching tool. I was put on a PIP that contained inaccurate claims even after I shared detailed evidence and context. I provided several solid pieces of documentation to HR to rebut the accusations, yet nothing meaningful was investigated or corrected in my case. HR felt more like a shield for management than a neutral party. In my experience, they protected internal politics instead of looking at facts and evidence. There is a culture of quiet compliance. Many people stay 10+ years because the pay and brand are “safe,” but they are hesitant to challenge unfair treatment or speak up about toxic behavior. Corporate hierarchy is heavy, and real decisions seem to depend more on who is backing your manager than on actual performance or documented facts.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All