Great choice if you are in your 20s, poor choice for mid-career professionals - Anonymous employee Google Employee Review

3.0
21 Nov 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- extremely nice and helpful people, great perks. - Generally take software engineering extremely seriously. - Hiring standards for young engineers are outstanding. We don’t hire programmers, we hire people who can think critically about problems and have the communication skills to solve them collaboratively - after a couple of years, the pay can be quite decent if you learn to play the Perf game correctly - senior leadership comes across as very competent, although they sometimes forget that they have gotten pretty far removed from things as the company has added more management layers

Cons

- hiring practices tend to favor smart people who have no relevant domain experience and it can take years for those hires to become effective - Extremely slow moving, with lots of red tape and badly outdated product development processes not seen elsewhere since the 20th century, at least on some teams - These processes tend to stifle the creativity and problem-solving skills that the engineers on the ground have in abundance - insular culture of self-regard. If it isn’t a Google product or technology, no one has heard of it or has any interest in it - Very consensus-driven decision-making, to the point at which groupthink is almost ubiquitous - This means that lots of smart people with limited information make lots of poor decisions when they get together as a group - the hype about data-driven decisions at google is b-s - Also worthy of note, your experience outside of Google, regardless of what you have accomplished, will be ignored or forgotten after you start. You are just another number among 100,000 others. - You will come across people who have worked at the company for 10 years or more and have completely lost touch with the outside world, yet are somehow put in charge of building products for those users in the outside world! - many longtime employees, including fairly senior folks, have only really shipped 1-2 products before because Google is so slow — and are much less experienced than they would otherwise appear - In short, if you have more than 8-10 years of work experience at other tech companies, don’t work here. You will work for people who are much less experienced than you and it will set your career back

Explore other reviews about Google

5.0
24 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great place to work and you learn alot

Cons

not sure, can be sometimes idk

4.0
21 Jun 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) Food, food, food. 15+ cafes on main campus (MTV) alone. Mini-kitchens, snacks, drinks, free breakfast/lunch/dinner, all day, errr'day. 2) Benefits/perks. Free 24:7 gym access (on MTV campus). Free (self service) laundry (washer/dryer) available. Bowling alley. Volley ball pit. Custom-built and exclusive employee use only outdoor sport park (MTV). Free health/fitness assessments. Dog-friendly. Etc. etc. etc. 3) Compensation. In ~2010 or 2011, Google updated its compensation packages so that they were more competitive. 4) For the size of the organization (30K+), it has remained relatively innovative, nimble, and fast-paced and open with communication but, that is definitely changing (for the worse). 5) With so many departments, focus areas, and products, *in theory*, you should have plenty of opportunity to grow your career (horizontally or vertically). In practice, not true. 6) You get to work with some of the brightest, most innovative and hard-working/diligent minds in the industry. There's a "con" to that, too (see below).

Cons

1) Work/life balance. What balance? All those perks and benefits are an illusion. They keep you at work and they help you to be more productive. I've never met anybody at Google who actually time off on weekends or on vacations. You may not hear management say, "You have to work on weekends/vacations" but, they set the culture by doing so - and it inevitably trickles down. I don't know if Google inadvertently hires the work-a-holics or if they create work-a-holics in us. Regardless, I have seen way too many of the following: marriages fall apart, colleagues choosing work and projects over family, colleagues getting physically sick and ill because of stress, colleagues crying while at work because of the stress, colleagues shooting out emails at midnight, 1am, 2am, 3am. It is absolutely ridiculous and something needs to change. 2) Poor management. I think the issue is that, a majority of people love Google because they get to work on interesting technical problems - and these are the people that see little value in learning how to develop emotional intelligence. Perhaps they enjoy technical problems because people are too "difficult." People are promoted into management positions - not because they actually know how to lead/manage, but because they happen to be smart or because there is no other path to grow into. So there is a layer of intelligent individuals who are horrible managers and leaders. Yet, there is no value system to actually do anything about that because "emotional intelligence" or "adaptive leadership" are not taken seriously. 3) Jerks. Sure, there are a lot of brilliant people - but, sadly, there are also a lot of jerks (and, many times, they are one and the same). Years ago, that wasn't the case. I don't know if the pool of candidates is getting smaller, or maybe all the folks with great personalities cashed out and left, or maybe people are getting burned out and it's wearing on their personality and patience. I've heard stories of managers straight-up cussing out their employees and intimidating/scaring their employees into compliance. 4) It's a giant company now and, inevitably, it has become slower moving and is now layered with process and bureaucracy. So many political battles, empire building, territory grabbing. Google says, "Don't be evil." But, that practice doesn't seem to be put into place when it comes to internal practices. :(

3865
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All