Nice people, sub-standard pay, beginner-to-intermediate level projects - Software Engineer Fresh Consulting Employee Review

2.0
13 Mar 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Nice folks in general (people are kind, tone is respectful) - Free lunch - On the East Side of Seattle (Bellevue), which is convenient if you live there. - Management tries to do its best given the circumstances.

Cons

- Sub-standard pay (despite management's claim to being "competitive"). - It's consulting: interesting, high-scale engagements are rather rare. Work-for-hire type of business model. - No intellectual property (no revenue stemming from product sales), so profits are strictly from billable hours. - Intense focus on utilization, PM-centric culture: everything is about allocating people to projects, avoiding benching, maximizing billable hours. - You are expected to work 40 hours a week, and then "give" 5 hours per week to the company. Meaning: you are paid for 40 hours, but your timesheet is expected to have 45 hours filled in by the end of the week. Depending on the projects, you might end-up working more than 40 hours: regardless, you'll still be paid for 40. - Projects are not that interesting: good place to start if you're a junior developer (then leave for greener pastures once you've reached a certain expertise). - Intermediate to senior engineers: avoid if you can. The projects can sometimes be interesting, but that's hit-and-miss. And the pay makes it not worth it. - Growth opportunities are limited.

Explore other reviews about Fresh Consulting

5.0
7 May 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company culture is friendly and welcoming with a talented staff that delivers high quality work at a great value to the customer.

Cons

The company was growing rapidly leading up to the pandemic which made for typical growing pains in staffing.

3.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fresh puts real effort into culture programs, and the workplace generally feels friendly and welcoming. There are many talented individual contributors across the company, and a lot of people genuinely care about doing good work and supporting each other.

Cons

The biggest challenge is organizational clarity and communication, especially within the digital studio. Management direction can feel inconsistent, and recent organizational changes and acquisitions have changed team structure in negative ways. There also seems to be frequent leadership change or shifting ownership, which makes it difficult for teams to understand priorities, connect day-to-day work to executive goals, and maintain momentum. At times, the digital studio feels disconnected from the broader C-suite strategy. Under newer studio management, the work culture shifted from feeling relatively balanced to more after-hours work and delayed feedback. In my experience, feedback that should have happened during the workday or in regular check-ins was often pushed until after hours. Career growth and feedback were not well supported in my experience. Over roughly nine months, most scheduled 1:1s focused on personal development and growth were canceled, with only a few actually happening outside of project-specific feedback. When a new career growth structure was introduced, I was placed below the level I had been hired into without a clear explanation or supporting examples. Pay does not feel competitive for the level of work expected, and the sales pipeline for digital specific projects does not always seem stable enough to support hiring plans.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All