Over the past 18 months, trust in leadership and confidence in internal processes have dropped significantly, and the shift’s been noticeable across the business.
Performance reviews, promotions and pay are tied to a calibration process employees can’t see into and aren’t given clarity on. Decisions are made privately, criteria are vague, and outcomes often aren’t properly explained. Ratings don’t feel performance-based; they feel decided.
Employees don’t get meaningful input into their own reviews, so outcomes depend heavily on how well a manager knows your work. If you’ve had a manager change during the year, that alone can affect your rating simply because they don’t have enough context.
Promotion’s tied to this same system, and it shows. Advancement doesn’t feel consistently merit-based. Pay transparency’s been talked about internally for over two years, yet salary bandings still haven’t been published, and discussing pay’s discouraged. That combination makes it hard to trust that decisions are fair.
Favouritism is a widely recognised issue internally. Several recent hires into influential roles have direct links to leadership from previous companies, while strong internal candidates struggle to even get interviews. The pattern’s obvious and widely discussed, and it seriously undermines trust in how hiring and progression decisions are made. It’s hard to ignore once you’ve seen it happen more than once.
Relationships clearly influence outcomes. Employees who regularly socialise with senior staff outside of work tend to progress faster than those who focus purely on performance. The environment rewards visibility and social alignment more than results, which creates a clear bias toward extroverted personalities. This isn’t something people whisper about, it’s widely recognised across teams.
Psychological safety is a real concern. Staff are encouraged to be open and honest, yet speaking candidly can later count against you, especially when “values” are assessed. The result’s predictable: people stop speaking up.
Turnover and tenure are now a structural risk. Over 60% of employees have been at the company less than two years, which has created knowledge gaps and increased pressure on those who remain. A large amount of experience has left (or been forced out), and the impact’s visible day to day.
Feedback mostly flows one way. Direction comes from the top, but honest upward feedback isn’t consistently welcomed or acted on. That limits improvement and discourages initiative.
Workloads are heavy, overtime’s common in some teams, and recognition or pay adjustment doesn’t always follow.