Stressful, Micromanaging, Blame Game Culture - Run Forest Run - Laboratory Manager Everly Health Employee Review

1.0
27 Dec 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Most of the people are respectful, knowledgeable and enjoyable to work with.

Cons

Remote leaders leading larger on site teams creates confusion. Creates a “you do what I say” culture and a culture heavy (heaviest I’ve ever seen) in micromanagement. No trust in experts and team members leads to demotivation. Some executives still think Machiavellian leadership is popular and rudely bark orders from the safety of their at home offices - akin to internet trolls. Doesn’t work for a clinical laboratory setting AT ALL. Remote leaders gradually become out of touch with the reality of leading actual humans face to face. Unrealistic expectations with regards to overtime with many teams members having 20-30 hours PER WEEK of overtime during busy times. Incentives are given however time from the people that actually care about you can’t be bought back. Team is repeatedly asked to work overtime and due to unpredictable workload and shoddy forecasting, The schedule can change daily during peak business creating issues for those with obligations in their personal lives.

Explore other reviews about Everly Health

5.0
14 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Supportive, forward facing management and leadership. They are truly involved in the process. This is a fast moving environment, where you are given the chance to expose yourself to new roles and duties every day. Hard work and dedication are noticed here, with annual compensation reviews. What you put into this environment, you will get out of it. Benefits are truly game changing. Many medical milestones in my life here, and I have never had to worry about the bill at the end of the day. This is something I can't say for many other employers at which I've worked.

Cons

I am content here. I can't think of any.

1.0
1 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not that i can think of.

Cons

Compensation remains low relative to workload and has not been adjusted despite ongoing feedback from employees. Workload did not align with staffing levels, leading to overstaffing and periods of inefficiency. The role operates in a highly transactional manner, where employees are treated as interchangeable resources rather than long-term contributors. Management communication lacked transparency, and feedback was not communicated directly to employees. There was no structured training process, limiting the ability to understand expectations or improve performance. Employment stability is limited, with sudden terminations occurring without prior notice when workload decreases.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All