employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Ellis Recruitment Group

Engaged employer

Great work environment with lots of opportunities for growth - Recruitment Consultant Ellis Recruitment Group Employee Review

5.0
8 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great working environment. Lots of opportunities for growth. Clear organisational structure.

Cons

early start to the day

Explore other reviews about Ellis Recruitment Group

5.0
19 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can tell they really care about their employees. I work with a great team and love the culture. There is growth and continuous development for everyone including mentors you can work with.

Cons

No cons at this time

1.0
20 Aug 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ability to work with several different sectors with being in a niche industry.

Cons

Working with the US Leadership and Team was a positive experience and showed great potential for success. However, this potential was never realized due to the lack of support, direction, and clarity from the UK Executive Leadership. Their guidance was inconsistent and ineffective, which made it difficult for the team to succeed despite numerous efforts. False promises were made regarding growth and promotions, with little to no recognition for hard work. In some cases, commissions were removed without notice. When concerns were raised, employees were often ignored or given vague responses. Even after experienced consultants were brought in to work with HR for ongoing issues, including poor communication, cultural differences between the US and UK markets, payroll/back-office errors, hiring, lack of sales support and training, unfortunately remained unresolved. Additionally, companywide emails were sent often from the Executive Team carried a threatening tone, creating an environment of fear and uncertainty. Employees became increasingly concerned about job security, yet HR and Consultants being fully aware of the situation, failed to intervene. Both UK and US employees were negatively affected, and although the Executive Team claimed to be open to feedback, in reality they were resistant to change and unwilling to implement meaningful improvements.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All