employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Distress Centre Calgary

Is this your company?

Leadership has issues - Supervisor Distress Centre Calgary Employee Review

3.0
27 Sept 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Meaningful work, kind front line staff, 24 hr snacks and coffee

Cons

The frontline and team lead staff care a lot about the clients and the organization but directors seems way off base. they say they care about staff but dont dedicate enough time to supporting us through these hard jobs. The front line work is hard but rewarding... but it's difficult to feel valued and supported by anyone other than my coworkers. they keep adding more and more programs and projects but we are all emotionally drained and just want to help people, it's not a business its a support service.

Explore other reviews about Distress Centre Calgary

3.0
15 Nov 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, we can work remotely or onsite

Cons

The CEO is disrespectful to certain departments. The management team is inexperienced and has no knowledge of how to treat people with respect. Used to be a great place to work but in the last 6 months have been terrible

3.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you are Canadian born or fit the organization’s visible minority DEI categories, this can be an excellent place to start your career. There is initial training, and the real learning comes from speaking with service users. The moments when you can genuinely support someone in crisis are deeply meaningful and rewarding. From the outside, this environment has the potential to be exceptional.

Cons

My experience as a white immigrant with an accent was markedly different. I consistently felt like an outsider who did not fit any of the organization’s DEI boxes, and this shaped how I was perceived and treated. Feedback was often belittling, inconsistent, or delivered without clear documentation. Expectations shifted without warning. Concerns were reframed rather than addressed. The contrast between how included some staff felt and how excluded others were was stark. This created a two tier experience: those who fit the preferred categories often thrived, while those in the “middle space” — not Canadian born, not visibly diverse, and not protected by any category — faced disproportionate scrutiny and marginalization.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All