employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CyberRisk Alliance

Is this your company?

Leadership hides the ball, pay gets worse over time, and people keep leaving - Director CyberRisk Alliance Employee Review

1.0
11 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Industry exposure. That's it. Nothing else.

Cons

Compensation actively punishes loyalty. Tenure means nothing here — newer hires come in at higher rates while long-term employees fall further behind, and leadership has no interest in correcting it. The executive team is not transparent. Information is withheld, decisions land without explanation, and staff are left to figure out what's actually going on. There is a persistent and obvious gap between what leadership says and what is true. Turnover is not a coincidence. People with options leave, and they keep leaving. If you're considering joining, ask how long the people in your department have actually been there. The answer will tell you everything.

Explore other reviews about CyberRisk Alliance

5.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company is very entrepreneurial and fast growing with many talented & dedicated professionals from across the United States.

Cons

The integration of my original company into the CyberRisk Alliance was challenging but in the end it was completed and overall revenues for most of the divisions increased.

1.0
12 Dec 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A few talented individuals who genuinely care about the work and customers.

Cons

Short-Term Profit Focus: The company is entirely focused on short-term financial gains, with no real investment in long-term growth or innovation. This mindset puts the organization at risk and creates an unstable environment for employees. Internal Competition: Product categories overlap significantly, which means teams often end up competing with each other instead of working collaboratively. This leads to inefficiency, confusion for customers, and missed opportunities. Declining Product Quality: The quality of the products has deteriorated over time. Instead of addressing this, the company relies heavily on aggressive email marketing to generate audience interest. As a result, you’ll often see mismatched attendees at executive-level events, including students who don’t belong there. Incompetent Management: Division-level leadership, with few exceptions, lacks the expertise to manage their business units effectively. They’re more focused on ego and appearances than on solving actual problems. Beneath them is a bloated layer of managers who display bias, favoritism, and a refusal to take accountability for ongoing failures. Toxic Culture: There’s no sense of ownership or responsibility for product and organizational failures. Prejudice and bias are evident, and the company has no mechanisms in place to address these systemic issues.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All