Klue-less - Anonymous employee Crayon Employee Review

1.0
6 Nov 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The usual, work with some good co-workers, unlimited vacation and that’s about it. Kudos to the constantly rotating sales team for getting anyone to pay for this broken mess of a platform, for without them this farce of a company wouldn’t exist. (average tenure of 1.3yrs on their LinkedIn) If you like token Woke politics, clapping and cheering on Zoom, posting emojis on Slack, then you’ll love it here.

Cons

Read the low star reviews from sales people, these tell you all you need to know. This company churns through them, and probably through sheer luck, someone’s network enables sale to a customer that will eventually leave later. “Competitive Intelligence” is just sales jargon, the platform is neither competitive nor intelligent. The platform is the culmination of years and years of guessing and continuous pivots. There are so many things wrong and so much to do, but meetings, inner politics, and cliquey behavior take priority as the incompetent leadership cling together. Confusingly, it seems like the "old-timers" here are just sitting around praying for a buyout or something. Product and Engineering leadership are completely clueless. They have no idea as to what to do next or how to run an organization that can actually produce anything of value. Up until recently, this company was copying Klue’s features, now they’re just utterly lost.

Explore other reviews about Crayon

2.0
22 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of Crayon's executive leadership team are incredibly bright, but access to them is limited to the occasional chat in the office or a training program they put together. That's where the good ends.

Cons

After spending a year working for Crayon, it is clear why they did not make Jeffrey Bussgang's rocketship list, but the competition, Klue, did. Crayon consistently misses sales targets, has high employee turnover, and fails to make decisions based on sound reasoning and data. Crayon's overall strategy is heavily based on what its competition is doing and tends to be reactive rather than proactive. This causes management to make poor, knee-jerk decisions that are not well thought out, and the downstream effects are not considered. Ultimately, the weight of these bad decisions falls on the shoulders of its mid & lower-level employees, who are forced to scramble to meet their objectives. Crayon does not promote or hire based on merit, data, and performance; instead, their culture is to hire and promote based on cliques, vibes, and popularity, leading to an eco chamber of like-minded individuals who are there to climb the corporate ladder, not better the organization. These individuals lie, cheat, and steal their way to success, often standing on their employees' shoulders while they call themselves tall. There is a reason the average tenure here has plummeted, and they only have two open positions. Their competition, Klue on the other hand, has 30 open positions and is growing. In a market where startups are fighting for funding, I'd be shocked to see Crayon around for much longer.

8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All