Worst for new grads - Consultant CGI Employee Review

2.0
1 Aug 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Things look good and rosy initially when they are not. - Severance offered was comparable with market

Cons

CGI does not has great mentors. The company will put you as a resource on loan at the start of your career without any clear expectations from the client (they expect the client to train you). When you gain the experience in client company culture, you are expected to again get trained for 3 months. In all 6 months gone in training. - You never know when you get terminated after coming from medical emergencies. - No consideration for human rights. - Very Unfair to grads (I would keep it as the last company to chose even if I had no job). - Company has no structure - Traditional ways of operations (aging workforce makes no place for new grads) - No encouragement for team building and team bonding - After terminating at a very early stage of your career you are left with difficulties to find a new jjob

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
27 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work environment Strong leadership

Cons

Room for growth can be limited unless you really seek it out.

1.0
16 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All