Avoid if you have other options. - Director CGI Employee Review

2.0
5 Feb 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Hands-off management structure - Flexible schedule

Cons

- Benefits sub-par - No merit raises, frequently not even cost of living increases. Wages across entire company stagnant. Management get 5-figure bonuses. Workers are lucky to get anything at all. - Company is frugal to the point of the ridiculous. No investment is made in members at all. No training. Any training (PMP, etc.) have to be done on member's own nickel and time. - Message is made very clear to workforce that you are easily replaceable. - Internal technology is embarrassingly bad. - Advancement/promotions are seemingly arbitrary, based usually on member's relationship with upper management, not competence. If you ask management what the path to advancement is, a lot of unquantifiable, subjective "qualities" will be described. The bottom line is that there are too many people at management level, and if they promote more people, their bonuses will decrease. -Very bland, unidentifiable corporate culture.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
5 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth, salary, learning material, freedom to plan your day

Cons

Could use better training guides for new employees

1.0
16 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All