Devastatingly poor management - Chemist BioAscent Employee Review

1.0
12 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are some genuinely excellent people working for this company that are hard-working, kind, generous, and incredibly intelligent. It was a pleasure working with most of the people there. It is a shame that these people are exclusively up to and including team leader level, not company or even department management.

Cons

I cannot speak for compound management or biology directly, only chemistry and general company management. The management system simply does not work, and concerns for stability and even basic human welfare are either ignored or met with anger, belligerence, and gaslighting behaviour. From the start, you’re made to feel very small, and there is such an enormous atmosphere of belittling if you’re not one of “the favourites”. If you are, however, any and all despicable behaviour you decide to inflict on your colleagues is swept under the rug, hidden, and you’re told not to “create a toxic environment” by opposing this. I can say with certainty that there is no equality amongst the staff here, and no intention to fix that – as demonstrated by the poor retention of female scientists in the chemistry department. There is no career advancement and there are no benefits – unless you count the car park on the side of the motorway as one, which the company clearly seems to. These are trying times to be a small company in this sector, that much is clear, but issues of company instability and attempted perseverance through these difficult times have been handled incredibly poorly by all of the management team, in particular by those allegedly working for HR. The recent round of redundancies that were made was unfortunate, and I do not deny that not only was it necessary but also very difficult for those making the decisions of who had to go. That aside, the lack of communication, the very heavily flawed way in which the process went ahead, and the ignorance of anxious human beings during this process left everyone in the chemistry department completely devastated. Personally, I know that I will never forget the ordeal that I went through, and I doubt anyone working there still or not will either. The worst part of it was that it would have taken the smallest of kind gestures or communication to prevent such a level of damage, and even this was too much of an ask. Bottom line, you are very much made to feel sub-human working here. If you value your physical or mental health, don’t do it.

Explore other reviews about BioAscent

1.0
13 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It was fine when there was work.

Cons

I worked as a chemist at BioAscent. It was always under strict authoritarian rule, so most line managers were selected in order to align, but not to contest. With this weak setup installed, it allowed one particular toxic individual to speak corrosively of others knowing that it would go unchecked. I lost my desire to work for the company because of this person. It will, however, go unnoticed to managers, because this person ticked the criteria boxes, despite killing the morale of most colleagues. Another manager gave a presentation critical of how the chemists were at presenting in meetings. This would be fine if it was presented so badly by himself.

1
1.0
11 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are some brilliant, highly skilled chemists working at BioAscent and it was fantastic to work with them. The workload was predictable.

Cons

Please take heed of other similar reviews on this platform, they unfortunately reflect the reality within the chemistry section at BioAscent. The culture here amongst management diminished staff confidence and professional worth, leaving myself and others feeling undervalued as chemists and people. There is no credible path for progression, improvement or career development but instead a career dead-end. Furthermore, there are no meaningful perks to working here and no performance related recognition. Given the tight fiscal environment, instead of paying employees a liveable wage, even basic professional recognition would suffice but was notably absent. All of this can be overlooked perhaps in the dire chemistry market of recent years however, management's behaviour during recent redundancy period was unforgivable. Redundancies are regrettable but understandable in the context of the difficult market conditions for smaller CROs. I think everyone at BioAscent understood the reality of the situation and why drastic change was necessary. The problem is the serious lack of duty of care shown by management towards employees during the difficult period. Decisions with profound professional and personal consequences were made with no transparency and compassion. Scoring was arbitrary, highly reckless and deeply insensitive in how individual circumstances were treated. Communications from management and HR were sparse, terse and at times highly confrontational and unapologetic. This was completely unacceptable, especially as basic human decency was all that was called for. There was no meaningful support for affected staff and a staggering lack of compassion or even acknowledgement of the human impact. The mismanagement and poor leadership resulted in the process becoming deeply personal and caused significant distress to many colleagues. This is an experience that I will never forget and has left a permanent black mark on this company. The incredibly poor management at BioAscent is a considerable shame. Given the high skill levels of the chemists working there and the wealth of chemistry talent available within Scotland more generally, this could have been a great company. However, it will remain an awful place to work unless significant changes are made at the top.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All