Worst place to work, should be 0 - Finance BNP Paribas Employee Review

1.0
6 May 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some colleagues were very nice

Cons

The rating of Bank of the West is so low that jobs are now posted under BNP Paribas's name. Don't be fooled! If you are working at Bank of the West, your professional life is very different than at BNP Paribas. Some reasons for it: Management has 0 ownership or accountability Lots of promises, rare delivery. HR policies are optional to managers. Lies are super frequent, last minute changes are the norm and no one seems to row in the same direction People get promoted based on friendships rather than talent Level of teams is mediocre: turnover in my team was >50% as talented people consistently left. Most colleagues were demotivated: ambiance at the office was depressing Very low recognition: best salary increase I've witnessed for overachiever was 4%.... .... But recognition for regular underachievers is always here: raises were never below 1% 0 budget for anything: corporate events are super rare, and usually low quality, team events look like a Starbucks promo event, and the majority of celebrations are farewell parties. Don't expect a restaurant lunch for team achievement, anniversaries or anything like it

Explore other reviews about BNP Paribas

5.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

love working here been here 4 years

Cons

return to office policy is tough

1.0
8 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The only good thing about this place were the Nespresso machines.

Cons

I rarely leave reviews, but future job seekers deserve fair warning. From day one, it was clear that micromanagement was a core operating principle here; not a quirk, but a feature. Managers routinely hovered over routine tasks, demanded pointless status updates multiple times a day, constantly changed directives, took credit for my work, and treated experienced professionals like they couldn't be trusted to send an email unsupervised. Any sense of autonomy was purely cosmetic. The culture was equally poisonous. Gossip wasn't background noise; it was practically a department function. Colleagues regularly spoke poorly of one another behind closed doors, cliques formed and hardened fast, and if you weren't part of the right group, you felt it. Unkind doesn't begin to cover it. Basic professionalism and common decency were in short supply. Management set the tone for all of it. Leaders who should have modeled integrity instead participated in the drama, played favorites openly, and addressed conflict with either complete avoidance or outright retaliation. HR was not a resource — it was a shield for bad behavior at the top. I left for my own sanity. The turnover rate here should tell you everything. Life is too short and your career too important to spend either in an environment like this one.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All