A Sinking Ship Steered by Clueless Captains – Protect Your Sanity and Stay Away - Anonymous employee Azami Global Employee Review

1.0
3 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

None. Nada. Zero. Nilch. Void.

Cons

Believe the reviews you read here. Protect your sanity and your soul by staying far, far away from Azami Global. Working here is a truly volatile, dehumanizing experience. Make no mistake, this company is on the absolute brink of collapse, and the blame falls squarely on the sheer, unadulterated stupidity of the entire C-suite. The executive team took a once-healthy company with healthy margins and drove it right into the ground in record time. Let's start from the top. The CEO genuinely thinks he’s the next Elon Musk, but in reality, you wouldn't trust him to run a hotdog stand. Instead of steering the ship, the CEO spends his time jet-setting all over the globe, taking useless meetings with investors and potential clients that yield absolutely nothing. It would be infinitely more valuable if the CEO bothered to learn what the workforce actually does, or what stages the company’s products are actually in—but he couldn’t care less about the reality on the ground. Then there is the CPO. The CPO has zero useful experience in product or R&D, and everything he touches turns to ash; he does far more harm than good. Instead of focusing on the actual work that would earn the company money, the CPO abuses ChatGPT all day to hallucinate completely useless ideas. He has no earthly idea what his subordinates do and actively sabotages their workflow. The only silver lining is that the CPO recently fired his entire organizational branch, so at least now he can't harm their processes anymore. The Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) is nothing more than a playground bully who either fires people or browbeats them into submission. The CRO walks around thinking he’s the smartest guy in the room, which couldn't be further from the truth. Meanwhile, the COO is simply rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. The COO clearly sees the ship going down, but instead of trying to save what can be saved, he is too busy massaging the numbers and adjusting reports to fit a rosy, fictional narrative. When you look past the executives, the tragedy of Azami Global becomes clear: almost anyone below the C-level is actually incredibly hardworking, knowledgeable, and genuinely good at what they do. Honestly, if the entire C-suite took a six-month vacation, the non-executive workforce could easily right the ship and save the company. But the C-suite makes that impossible. The executives set completely pie-in-the-sky, unreal goals and then terminate staff before they can even lace up their boots to try and achieve them. Instead of owning the outcomes, the C-suite simply deflects blame downward. They constantly cycle through a revolving door of new scapegoats, pinning all the company's failures on the people who were let go or jumped ship. Meanwhile, the actual perpetrators—the ones with a 'C' in front of their title—stay indefinitely, repeating the exact same fundamental mistakes from their ivory towers. If anyone dares to speak up, the C-suite hits them with ridiculous, nonsensical corporate slogans designed to sweep criticism under the rug. The executive leadership weaponizes phrases like “internal locus of control” simply to shut down any and all pushback against the terrible decisions being made at the top. The brain drain has become so severe that it is literally the blind leading the blind. Institutional knowledge has been completely wiped out, and turnover is so high that staff members with barely any tenure are now forced to train brand-new arrivals on systems that neither of them knows the first thing about. This place is a textbook example of how toxic C-level leadership can destroy a good thing. Save yourself the heartache and look elsewhere.

Explore other reviews about Azami Global

1.0
12 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

At one point, the company had real potential and a collegial, collaborative spirit that made it an exciting place to work.

Cons

A promising, empowering workplace has deteriorated into a toxic, demoralizing environment. The company has entered a steady downward spiral marked by poor strategy, lack of accountability, and declining business performance. Leadership does not listen to employees or customers and appears increasingly detached from reality. The CEO continues to double down on a failed vision, refusing to pivot despite clear commercial under-performance and lack of market demand. Accountability is pushed downward and used against managers and individual contributors, with a new scapegoat each month. Collaborative decision-making does not exist - leaving a strategic vacuum shaped by individual egos. The arrival of a new CRO and a new Head of Operations in August cemented the company's decline. The commercial team is under constant scrutiny, burned out and miserable. For years, the company had credible revenue leadership, but now the role has reinforced the CEO’s failed strategy and poor people management. Micromanagement is extreme, targets and structure shift frequently and market realities are ignored. The culture has further deteriorated under the Chief Product Officer, who has failed to deliver products that can be commercialized, and has only enabled and reinforced toxicity. Employees who raise legitimate concerns or differing opinions are labeled “negative” and pushed toward termination. Burnout and mental health struggles are met with dismissive language, trivializing employee well-being and defining the leadership style. Turnover is significant for a company of roughly 70 people, with many long-tenured employees leaving (without alternate employment in hand) to escape the chaos. Compensation has stagnated, internal technology is unreliable, and there is little meaningful training in a highly specialized industry. The office environment is defined by fear, stress and exhaustion, with people treated as replaceable components in a failing system. Recent positive reviews do not reflect reality. Don't be fooled.

5
5.0
22 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Clear Strategic Pivot: Transitioning to a product-first model is the right move for long-term growth. It’s exciting to be part of building something that scales. Effective Change Management: Leadership has been transparent about the "why" behind these shifts. There are clear roadmaps and a real effort to bring everyone along for the journey. Professional Growth: If you want to learn how a company matures and scales, this is a masterclass. The opportunities for those who embrace the new direction are significant. High Impact: Moving away from bespoke services means the work we do on the product side has a much wider reach and lasting impact.

Cons

Growing Pains: You can’t overhaul a business model without some friction. Processes are being rewritten, which can feel a bit chaotic at times. Pace of Change: The transition is moving fast. If you prefer a static environment where things stay the same for years, the current speed might feel overwhelming. Legacy Mindsets: There is still some internal resistance from those who prefer the old way of doing things, which can occasionally slow down momentum.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All