Still haven’t mentally recovered - Head Office Staff Aspiga Employee Review

1.0
1 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-The team is the best part of this company. -Working within a small team can bring out your strength. -Always striving for perfection and the garments reflect this. -The design room has treat Friday but this is at your expense. -Everyone is open to talk about ways of improving the company, no matter your department.

Cons

Firstly any Glassdoor review that states, no cons! These reviews are on here due to the director asking her “favourite” members to post a good review on here. Well-being washing, the company stated in the impact report that they achieved this, I would like to ask how? If anything Aspiga makes people stressed, doubt their ability and shames sick days for mental health (even when they caused the anxiety). I am actually still recovering from how this company treats people. Employee discounts being reduced and the number of times you can use the discount is restricted. Sample sales are offered but 10% discount on what the normal consumer would pay, so not much at all. Early Friday finishes in summer are only if you hit targets, these said targets are almost impossible. The mental wellness scheme is flawed and not followed. Profits are of upmost importance to this company. Excuses are made for the directors behaviour No diversity and most employees are from a upper class background Nothing is set in stone and there isn’t any structure, prepare yourself for putting out fires Pay day is not at midnight or even 9am, most likely 6:30pm on that day. Pension rules not followed.

Explore other reviews about Aspiga

4.0
10 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great product, loved all the other employees, very kind.

Cons

High attrition rate, no training on the role.

1.0
24 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you enjoy chaos and intimidation, this may suit you. An educational lesson in what to avoid in leadership.

Cons

Highly toxic and unprofessional working environment. From the outside, the company presents itself as progressive and values-led. Internally, the culture felt very different. There is a consistent atmosphere of blame and fear. When mistakes occur, responsibility is often shifted onto interns or junior staff, creating a culture of self-preservation rather than accountability. It frequently felt as though blame was redirected to protect senior leadership instead of addressing issues constructively. Managers have shouted at staff in front of others, which is particularly uncomfortable given the open-plan working environment. With no private spaces for constructive conversations, criticism is often delivered publicly, creating a culture of embarrassment rather than professional development. Intern compensation equated to approximately £5 per hour for what was effectively a full-time role. Interns were categorised as “volunteers,” despite working full-time hours and carrying significant responsibility within the business. In practice, the role closely resembled that of a standard employee rather than a voluntary arrangement, and the pay structure appeared inconsistent with UK minimum wage regulations. There is very little structure or formal training. New starters are thrown in with minimal guidance and then criticised if they struggle. There is no proper HR function, no meaningful development plan, and limited opportunity for growth or progression. The working environment itself is not a standard professional office. Staff are based in what is essentially a converted retail/store space rather than a dedicated office setting, which adds to the sense of disorganisation and lack of infrastructure. Exposed electrical wires were frequently left unsecured around the workspace, and on one occasion the founder’s dog chewed through live cables. Stress levels are high, wellbeing support is minimal, and resilience appears to be expected rather than professional management practices being implemented. Despite outward messaging, the internal experience did not align with the values presented externally. Prospective employees should look carefully beyond the brand image and consider whether the internal culture matches their expectations.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All