employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Data Systems International

Is this your company?

Data Systems International Reviews

3.0

44% would recommend to a friend

(157 total reviews)

Mark Goode

51% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Data Systems International has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 157 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Data Systems International employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

157 reviews
2.0
18 Nov 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I'll miss having parking downtown, however little I used it. The gym memberships and on-site massages were nice. The office is pretty to look at, if you enjoy looking at offices.

Cons

Okay. The thing about running a software company is that your main product is an incredibly complex system that requires years of hands-on experience to understand fully. And I don’t mean from an end-user standpoint, here. I mean it takes years to learn all the little pieces that are going into the product, how they all work together, their little quirks and oddities, and how to make the whole thing keep working and make changes that don’t blow it to smithereens. Your coders are not just line workers, hammering out upgrades to order; they are the collective intelligence of your company. And when they start leaving in droves--voluntarily or otherwise--it’s time to worry. Recently at DSI a change in management has put the company in charge of someone who came up through sales. Now, the dynamic in sales is no doubt very different, and moving people in and out more fluid. But in the last year or so, the development team has been stunned, watching their coworkers being swept out the door in no-notice layoffs. They’ve seen raises and the bonus plan ebb away into nothingness, even as they were assured the company was doing better than ever. The message they have received is that they are not valued, that they are seen as interchangeable cogs rather than, as is the case, the institutional memory of the company. They have seen what loyalty gets them--the door. A sharp programmer can always find someplace that will value their skills, and when that’s the case, why hang around? In short, the people who Know How It All Works are leaving. And when that happens, there is an inevitable downward spiral. The next wave of people, seeing the top-tier people gone, bail out themselves. And on down the line until you get to the point where the only people who haven’t left are the ones who have nowhere else to go. Now, what sort of a job do you think is going to be done at that point? I’m afraid at DSI the tipping point has already been passed. When I left, I left the development floor half-empty, and those remaining wondering what is to happen next. Whether the 12th (executive) floor has quite caught on to the magnitude of what is happening is anyone’s guess. The departure of one of their key people for a job with Apple at least should have raised some alarms. But even if it did--and there is no guarantee it did--it honestly may well be too late. I very much fear DSI is in for a talent slump that it will take years to recover from.

1.0
7 Nov 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Primo downtown location, if that is your thing. Across the street from Power & Light and a block from streetcar access. Partnership with OneLife Fitness across the street, great deals on personal training with an on-staff trainer providing assistance. Free membership as well. Offices are very neat and well maintained, office format is midway between open office and cubicles, separate enough to feel private but open enough for great co-worker communications. Two days of working from home a week. 401k match up to 5% of salary, 0.5% for each percentage after that up to 7%.

Cons

Below market pay across the board. Lack of investment in on-prem, full-time development. Out of company & country contractor partners are hard workers but they make up the most of development staff at this point, leading to little oversight of overall quality of completed work, interpersonal investment in the company, and the lack of proper incentives for them to do more than the minimum in some cases. Reliance on legacy technologies and proprietary software to assemble solutions is an extreme limiting factor to developing maintainable software. An exodus of development staff both from layoffs and from people reaching the same conclusion as I did is leaving a lot of these legacy technologies without owners or the know-with-all to support it. While it wasn't always this way, honestly a toxic culture. This is especially true for the product I was working on for the past two years. Too much reliance was put on sales for this product that should have never reached market as quick as it did. We were always under the target of executive management but yet we're never given the support or leeway to solve key technical debt holding the product back. Very much a 1 step forward, 2 steps back kind of frustration. While I can't expect 100% transparency, it is clear that executive management is incapable of facilitating communication channels between the various branches of the company. This led to various points of failure and miscommunication across the board. Work life balance is a complicated one, some will definitely be in a role where this is manageable, but at least in the experience of mine and my direct co-workers, was negative. Workload was filled with ill-conceived deadlines and scope, with little to no forethought as to ask development whether or not it was feasible or not. Many times during my tenure me and several co-workers had targets on our backs to meet these hard customer deadlines with management garnering little sympathy or learning any lessons from these extremely obvious struggles. Many people, including myself, worked exorbitant work schedule to support these deadlines and continual stream of customer issues. At the end of the day, all of the above points interacted and created a caustic cycle that we could seemingly never get out of. Any success was a point for more and more to be put on our plate without regard of the critical failures we endured on the way there.

2.0
23 Oct 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Have access to gym membership at a good gym downtown KC. Recently started matching 401K Clean and good work space. Sponsor international H1B employees visa - not sure anymore. I met excellent co-workers and managers at DSI - most gone now.

Cons

Recently DSI lost most of its developers due to 1) lack of stability, 2) no clear vision for product 3) lack of stable revenue means 3) Salary and bonus freeze (only one team getting some bonus). DSI did not strive to pay industry/city avg salary to developers. Following few devs suggestions; they started assessing industry/city compensations and came back with some offers and changes - in my opinion, it was too late and not significant. Most(>10) dev people left (fired/quit) in the past 3 months including the CTO. These were important people who knew the product inside out and wrote some of the product from scratch for many years. DSI does not seem to want to fill these positions; which goes back to no direction or means of stable revenue. Leadership also took away anniversary money bonuses when people were due to be paid...its DSIs way of showing appreciation i guess. Overall its not stable place and does not appreciates devs.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 157 Reviews

Glassdoor has 172 Data Systems International reviews submitted anonymously by Data Systems International employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Data Systems International is right for you.