employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Child Mind Institute

Is this your company?

Child Mind Institute Reviews

1.8

6% would recommend to a friend

(117 total reviews)

Harold S. Koplewicz, MD

7% approve of CEO

11% positive business outlook

Child Mind Institute has an employee rating of 1.8 out of 5 stars, based on 117 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a poor working experience there. The Child Mind Institute employee rating is 48% below average for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

117 reviews
2.0
12 Mar 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The operations team on the foundations side of the agency was fantastic. Friendly, sweet, passionate...they made coming in every day tolerable. Salary was OK for the position. Location was easily accessible and the hours were standard 8am-4pm. HR was also fair.

Cons

Harold is a bully and a tyrant. Unless you were a PhD, you were treated like a second class citizen by the psychologists/clinicians. I've never been made to feel so little before in my life. My supervisors were misleading, condescending and unreasonable. Training was lacking and if you made a mistake or asked a question for clarification, you were made to feel like a burden. Although many places have incorporated a 30 minute lunch break, you felt guilty for taking it. No other breaks were offered. The place caters to the elite and if you're not that...they'll make sure you're aware of it.

1.0
22 Jul 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Beautiful office, smart clinicians and nice staff associates. Good benefits, generous PTO, monthly staff lunches, high-profile organization. FOUNDATION: Great mission, good fundraising ability, good hours. CLINICAL: Very smart, nice clinicians and staff associates. They do great work, and are leaders in their field.

Cons

Where to begin? I should've heeded the previous reviews, but they're absolutely accurate about CMI being a toxic environment. CMI execs/HR know very well about these reviews, but simply choose to disregard them (as I did, to my detriment). FOUNDATION: Management is untrustworthy (as is HR), unfocused (at the whims of the president), and unorganized. Many staffers don't have the skillsets needed for their jobs, but are hired because most others are scared away from applying (I now know why), or have some connection to the Board or donors. Executive leadership is poisonous: self serving, disorganized, and quick to blame others (usually junior staff). Management frequently is indecisive or doesn't want to take responsibility for projects, so if they are unsuccessful (in reality, or just in the president's view), they won't be blamed. Routinely, decisions are compelled to be made by consensus of a number of influential staff that have no expertise in that particular project. Another review mentioned having to work on 'emergency' projects that have become so because of poor planning by management -- this is absolutely accurate, and happens very often, if not weekly. Junior staff follows Executives' lead, and work in fear, seeking to avoid being blamed for something. Due to indecisiveness of executives, they lack real direction and leadership, and isn't able to grow. Junior staff has also become infamous for filing complaints with HR or management for any perceived slights. The president is an NYC socialite, obsessed with celebrities, and a bully, and sets the tone for the organization. It's a running "joke" amongst staff that he's feared, unreasonable, and obsessed with celebs. (there have been quite a few lawsuits found in the public record) YELLS (!) at staff... often. He's elitist, and tends to judge staff by their background/connections/school. (which is ironic, knowing his background). He often creates chaos when he gets an idea or a goal in mind (viable or not), and staff is compelled to make that a top priority, regardless of other projects. Extremely high staff turnover -- staff often talks about how people come and go quickly. Executive leadership has continued to change drastically for a number of years, due to the above.

1.0
4 Jan 2018

I would keep looking for a more rewarding job

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Many of the employees are friendly, pleasant to work with and incredibly talented * The mission is really great, and the ambition and growth rate speak to a company that wants to see and effect change sooner rather than later * Pretty decent hours, pay, time off and benefits for a nonprofit

Cons

*Note: I worked on the foundation, or Institute, side of the business. There's also a clinical side, and the experiences and happiness of the employees there are often a totally different story, so I can only speak to where I worked. Overall I would say management is the biggest problem here, and the reason the Child Mind Institute can't overcome its biggest challenges as a company or retain talent. Executives (and particularly the two corner offices) are not approachable or easy to work for, and do not have the right priorities for a nonprofit focused on children's needs. There's a lot left to be desired with the way they treat people. In less than 2 years there, I witnessed many occasions where the president screamed at or ridiculed employees, where the executive director was condescending and purposely made employees feel stupid, and where another executive rudely cut off "lesser" employees in meetings with offensive words and body language. There's definitely a sense of hierarchy here, and the president is at the helm, setting completely the wrong tone for the entire organization. While ambitious and a reliably hard worker (and he has built an amazing empire with the Child Mind Institute, it must be said), he is also incredibly vain--he seems to care mainly about education, wealth, dress, social status, what your spouse does, what kind of family you come from--and if you don't measure up, he writes you off right away. When an employee makes an honest mistake, he disciplines the way he would his two-year-old child, and routinely shouts (!) in the office. He lacks tolerance and compassion and can be a nightmare to work for, or even occasionally interact with. I also saw a good many worrisome business decisions made while I was there. The executives tend to say yes to everything, which any smart entrepreneur will tell you is not the best way to grow a business. Instead they simply assume their staff will make the work happen, even if it isn't the best strategic choice for the organization's vision at the end of the day (not to mention they have no concept of the time or resources it actually takes to make Projects A, B, C and D that fly in the door at the same time work, and work well.) Hey management: Sometimes a strategic "no" is the right answer once in awhile! While I was employed here, a smaller company was acquired with no indication whatsoever of a business plan. It quickly became apparent that management had no plan for bringing them on board and integrating them into the company. Instead, they gave them all desks in one windowless room for an indefinite period of time, and one by one each of these employees quit. Anytime a question was brought forward about this group and a vision, strategy or plan for it, a satisfactory answer was never provided. Management's preferred way of dealing with a problem is to keep passing it off to someone else to handle instead of addressing the problem head-on or training the staff; for example, I once witnessed a corner-office executive unhappy with the way a department did a project that was clearly under their purview, and instead of addressing this with the head of the department, they simply passed it off to another department's assistant who, of course, didn't have the proper expertise, and caused further errors. There is no leadership training or accountability that managers have, which would be a huge benefit. There is insufficient, haphazard training for the role once you are hired, and expectations for receiving a promotion and raise are purposely kept vague so that growing within your role or moving up in your department becomes impossible. Furthermore, I witnessed managers and executives gossip and ridicule junior staff or other departments at various times, which is frustrating, to say the least, and incredibly unproductive. While the hours and pay are fairly decent, you ARE expected to check your email around the clock and to work from home on sick days. Management is focused on all the wrong things, most of which center around vanity (an out-of-office bounceback message, a perfectly appropriate sign at a desk). This is an organization that has a certain profile (Park Avenue offices, beautiful employees, uber-wealthy board of directors & executives) and that's fine if your prerogatives are looks, status and money. It's just a little odd to see in a nonprofit with such a special mission. A shame, really. There are better nonprofits out there. My advice? Work for one of them instead.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 117 Reviews

Glassdoor has 144 Child Mind Institute reviews submitted anonymously by Child Mind Institute employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Child Mind Institute is right for you.