BenevolentAI Reviews

3.6

50% would recommend to a friend

(121 total reviews)

François Nader

37% approve of CEO

25% positive business outlook

BenevolentAI has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 121 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The BenevolentAI employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

121 reviews
1.0
12 Nov 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Salary is reasonable for outside of finance (but lower than the other EU tech scale ups. interviews are not hard) - There are a handful of genuinely exceptional individuals here - Hours are fine

Cons

- Promotion seemed to me to be disconnected from ability. Managers are often not directly exposed to the work of people they manage, so promotion can depend on being allocated work that looks good in a promotion pack. Those with more senior managers are generally better supported and allocated the best projects for promotion packs regardless of technical ability. Those with newer managers who do not understand how to navigate the promotion structure as well may miss out. - I felt pigeonholed into my role. When I was recruited, I was told this would not happen, then when I asked about a role transition a few months in, this was not supported. - Engineering/technical standards are generally quite average in my opinion, even at very senior levels. I was unimpressed by the quality of the engineering; it is low compared to other places I have worked. There is a "manage yourself" approach, which is totally not suited to an org of this size now. The technical culture is not one of excellence but one of managerial politicking. - I experienced a dog-eat-dog, ego-driven, insecurity infused culture where bullies and narcissists can thrive (I tried reporting several incidents to HR, who had no interest whatsoever in investigating). I think this largely arises from rapidly overhiring into an environment where there isn't actually a defined product or enough engineering tasks to work on, having ineffective leadership across most functions with no expectations/accountability enforced, academics with no business/product sense being given vast amounts of responsibility for business/product decisions - It felt totally unclear to anyone what the product is and there was no improvement on that while I was there, nor do I believe there's any real prospect for improvement based on my experience of working here. - I dealt with a few really toxic behaviours. I tried to report these to HR but it felt clear to me they weren't interested in taking my concerns seriously, and had already decided to support the other parties, without any proper investigation of my complaints or a desire to really understand what I was experiencing. This led to some burnout.

avatar
BenevolentAI Response
4y
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We know there’s always room for improvement and have very deliberately invested a great deal of time and resources in cultivating a culture our people can feel proud of; somewhere our people can feel included, supported and empowered to speak up. We take feedback seriously and rely upon a variety of feedback loops in order to improve our people's experience. We appreciate the time taken to leave these comments, and wanted to provide an in-depth response. Relating to your comments on promotions, we have clear career level frameworks and our promotions process is designed to be objective and fair. The process gathers far-reaching feedback — from peers and managers — to build an accurate and detailed picture of the level an individual is operating at, and all promotions are then calibrated. We accept no process is perfect, and in response to your comments, we will introduce sessions specifically on the promotions framework for our new managers. We are disappointed to hear that you felt pigeonholed into your role. We always encourage people to discuss the different opportunities that interest them around the business and are proud to have facilitated a large number of lateral moves around different product areas this year to make sure people have access to different career opportunities. As much as we try to facilitate such moves, business priorities and resourcing needs can mean this isn't always possible. We have multiple support resources in place for those who need it, including enhanced mental health and wellbeing coverage in our benefits package, and any incidents reported to our people team are taken seriously and investigated and dealt with accordingly. We really care about doing the right thing for our people and our teams, and our response is always to review possible approaches and work with individuals to agree on what the best path forward is for them. Like many scaleups trying to transform a traditional industry, we have a fast-paced environment that may not appeal to everyone. We try our best to hire with our culture and workplace requirements in mind, but sometimes we may not mesh with an individual’s preferred work style or expectations. We’re sorry you didn't have a great experience during your time here and wish you the best for the next step in your career.
4.0
20 Jan 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice work/life balance. Great people. Croissants on Monday, popcorn machine and footbal table.

Cons

Poor senior management. No clear career path

avatar
BenevolentAI Response
9y
Thanks for the feedback. Career paths can be challenging in a start up, especially for technical positions. So we have just introduced a unified scale for seniority for all tech positions. That should give you some clarity as to your position with regard to your peers and what promotion prospects are available. If you still have questions about it, please post them to our bi-weekly Q&A session. Also if you have concerns about the SMT, please raise them in these sessions as well, your feedback/questions are very welcome and stay completely anonymous by default.
3.0
18 Jan 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are fantastically talented people at Benevolent working to solve extremely challenging and stimulating problems. It's never boring. I was also impressed with how much my colleagues engaged in building a positive culture and went above and beyond to find better ways of doing things and of working together.

Cons

The leadership team did not seem to value positive culture and improvement in the same way as the development teams. Conflicts were often escalated rather than attempting mediation and there was little traction for trying new things. It often felt like small victories, valued by the teams, were dismissed higher up. Decision making was often slow and strategy unclear. In many cases there seemed to be a disconnect between what was being presented in town hall meetings and what was actually being implemented on the ground.

avatar
BenevolentAI Response
5y
Indeed, no company is immune to a negative culture. For this reason, we hired an Employee Engagement Manager to ensure everybody’s voice is heard and to help gather on-the-ground feedback on how we can improve. We have created channels for employees to share feedback and suggest new ideas, for example, our ‘What’s on your mind?’ team lunches with our CEO Joanna actually gave rise to several initiatives now in place at the company like Challenge Days. We are always open to feedback and appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts!
Viewing 1 - 3 of 121 Reviews

Glassdoor has 136 BenevolentAI reviews submitted anonymously by BenevolentAI employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if BenevolentAI is right for you.