Extractive and shady hiring process. Multiple rounds followed by on-site and asked heavily specific questions. A large share of the questions were strikingly specific to live challenges the team is currently working through, not hypotheticals or standard competency questions, but "here's a real thing we're stuck on, how would you approach it." Each time I gave a substantive answer, interviewers pushed for more: specific suppliers, real numbers, methodology, the actual playbook. At some point it stopped feeling like an evaluation of how I think and started feeling like a working session where I was the only person in the room not getting paid for it. If you're coming from an adjacent industry, understand that your perspective on their open problems may be the thing they're actually after. My advice to anyone entering this loop: talk about how you'd approach problems at a framework level, and be cautious about handing over the detailed, company-specific solutions you've built elsewhere until there's a real offer on the table.