My interviewing experience at Sorenson left much to be desired, to say the least. It began with an email I received a day after applying for the position, informing me that they were exclusively hiring for evening and graveyard shifts, with an expectation to work holidays and cover additional shifts—a crucial detail conveniently omitted from the initial application. Nevertheless, I opted to proceed with the interview process, and it was scheduled for the following week via a Teams call. The hiring manager initially joined the call, only to abruptly cancel the interview, promising to reschedule. The actual interview finally occurred a week later, and it followed the conventional script: a description of the position and generic questions about my experience. They even indicated that my background aligned perfectly with their needs. They mentioned that I would hear about the next round in a couple of days. But then, two weeks elapsed with no word from them. I assumed I hadn't made it to the next stage. I then received an invitation to interview with the IT director, scheduled for a couple of days later. However, the interview was marred by a last-minute cancellation, followed by a rescheduled time only a few hours later. The second interview itself was strikingly similar to the first, with more of the same questions and assurances that my experience was precisely what they were seeking. They once again promised to get back to me promptly about an offer. I sent a follow-up email on the following Thursday. Sadly, my inquiry went unanswered. It wasn't until a week and a half later that I received an email, stating that they had 'decided to move in a different direction.' In the end, not getting the position wasn't a disappointment, as this entire experience revealed that Sorenson may not be the best place to work. The lack of professionalism, communication, and the repeated scheduling mishaps throughout the process were clear indicators of their flawed interviewing practices.