Recruiter call, then a Hiring Manager conversation (discussed technical topics, experience, etc), then a technical interview with team members (discussed technical topic questions, find a bug, then a leetcode style question)

Super outdate interview model. The recruiter is usually non responsive, the process was disorganized and slow. Surprisingly slow for a company that claims to go fast. Presentation part seems outdated. Most engineers I talked to didn’t really know what they were doing. Some interviewers were friendly, others disorganized and lack an understanding of software engineering but pretended to understand it all. I would not recommend.

I recently completed the interview process at Shield AI and found it well-structured and candidate-friendly. The entire process took approximately 4-5 weeks. After applying, an internal recruiter reached out to discuss the role and compensation expectations. The first interview was a relaxed 45-minute call with the hiring manager, covering role details, team expectations, and my motivations for seeking a new position (essentially a conversational behavioral interview). Next was a 60-minute technical screen using CoderPad, featuring an open-ended problem. AI assistance was permitted, and the focus was on problem-solving approach and communication rather than arriving at a complete solution. The final stage was an onsite with four sessions: a 60 min technical retrospective presentation, a 45-min technical interview, and two 30-min behavioral interviews focusing on values and teamwork respectively. Throughout the process, the recruiter was exceptionally responsive, proactively scheduling interviews and thoroughly answering my questions. I received an offer within two business days of the onsite and, after negotiating, accepted the position. Overall, I found the entire interview process to be extremely fair and thorough.