I applied online. I interviewed at Quantiphi (Mumbai) in Sept 2025
Interview
Round 1 was good enough. Interview was going through relevant questions!
Round 2 of the interview was one of the most unprofessional experiences I’ve had. The interviewer joined late and spent almost the entire session asking irrelevant HTML/CSS questions, barely touching on Angular and not at all on .NET or SQL — the actual core skills required for the role.
As a candidate with 8 years of fullstack experience across .NET, Angular, SQL, and React, I expect interviews to reflect the responsibilities of the position. This round felt unstructured, misaligned, and ultimately a waste of time.
Candidates prepare seriously for these opportunities, and companies should ensure their interviewers are equally prepared and focused on evaluating the right skills.
Advice to Management:
Please align interviewers with the actual role requirements. Respect the candidate’s time and effort by ensuring interviews are structured, relevant, and professional.
Ask me about yourself and other things like any coding language and SQL also with some sample queries and challenges to solve .
how to approach to problem statement and work under pressure
I applied through on-campus recruitment. The selection process had three rounds:
Online Assessment (OA):
Logical reasoning and calculation-based questions
Pseudocode writing
Some coding problems
Technical Interviews:
Virtual Interview: Focused on introductions, projects mentioned in my resume, a basic math question similar to the OA, and an easy-level DSA question. The emphasis was more on problem-solving approach rather than perfect coding.
Face-to-Face Interview: Went deeper into projects. Some candidates were also asked about system design of their projects.
HR Round:
Standard HR questions
Overall: The interviewers valued problem-solving skills, clarity of thought, and understanding of projects over just coding.
I applied through university. I interviewed at Quantiphi (Mumbai) in Oct 2025
Interview
The interview started with a discussion about my projects, where I was asked to explain the problem statement, technologies used, and my individual contribution. The interviewer focused on how well I understood the design decisions and real-world impact of the projects.
Next, I was asked questions from core computer science subjects, mainly to test my fundamentals and conceptual clarity.
Finally, the interview concluded with one DSA problem, where the interviewer evaluated my problem-solving approach, logic, and ability to explain the solution clearly rather than just writing code.
Overall, the interview focused on practical understanding, core fundamentals, and structured thinking.