Typical interview process with a technical test. The technical test platform was one of the worst experiences I've ever had. Recording my face, screen and couldn't use google. I couldn't solve one of the tasks and since it won't let you move on to the next one without completing the current one I couldn't continue working on the problem. The tasks also seemed excessive for the amount of time. Seems like more and more companies are hiring for robots and not humans.

A recruiter reached out via LinkedIn, and despite not actively seeking a new role, the company and industry piqued my interest. Following an initial call, I was given a timed CodeSignal assessment. This proctored test, while efficient for the company, felt impersonal. The evaluation criteria were unclear, and the platform's focus on strict code completion, even for tasks requiring language-specific documentation lookups (like Kotlin), seemed overly rigid. Ultimately, I was rejected without any feedback. Looks like the company prioritizes algorithmic scores over individual merit... potentially missing out on valuable talent. While I understand the need for efficient hiring, relying solely on algorithmic scores from third-party platforms doesn't accurately reflect a candidate's potential or value. I'm hesitant to pursue opportunities with companies that don't invest in personalized assessment.