There were four stages to the application process: a timed written test, a preliminary interview, an interview with the editor, and then a (paid) article. I was given around two business days to complete the article - and it asked for 1-3 interviews with high-up industry experts. Securing these with no prior contacts/relationships in the time given was incredibly difficult; I understand journalism involves strict deadlines but considering the amount Key Media expect from you during the application process, the communication from them is absolutely shocking. I did the paid test in the first week of December and they then asked for references. They contacted my referees (who both promptly replied)... and then I didn't hear back from them for weeks. I was told I would "definitely" hear back before the holidays. I didn't hear from them again until the 5th January, when they reached out to check I was still interested in the role and to reassure me they expected to make a final decision before the end of the week. Cut to 13th January when I reached out AGAIN to check whether they would notify unsuccessful candidates, and within the hour received a stock rejection email. I understand stock rejections are nothing unusual but considering the effort that went into the task, the fact they contacted my referees, and the fact they reached out to check I was still interested, I think this is very poor behaviour. Reading the other reviews here makes me think the rejection is a blessing in disguise.

Had to do a written test - given a press release and told to write it up with a unique angle. Next stage was an interview in which I was asked about my background and experience, how I would go about starting a new network, why I thought I was a good fit Didn't get the job and didn't receive feedback though - if I got feedback, would be a positive experience.