Interesting process. Completed a HireVue (recorded) interview as a first step. As a talent professional I was excited to observe this from a candidate's perspective. Less personal but I can see the advantages from the recruiting team's perspective. I was then invited to the next step which was a case study interview with two staff members including the hiring manager. I was surprised by the HM's communication skills, which seemed to lack the sophistication and maturity that I would have anticipated for someone in this role. It is clear they do a LOT of promoting from within. I sensed a bit of constant movement in their structure (which has pros and cons). The case study was a scenario specific to a current issue facing the team and, more specifically, a challenge the individual coming into this role would be tackling. It was an interesting and complex issue, but definitely not one a candidate would have deep context on unless s/he 1) already worked in the organization, and/or 2) had internal connections enabling some additional prep. Limited details were provided. I sensed that my approach to the issue involved a level of collaboration that they were not seeking (definitely seems the desire was to have a change "mandated" versus arrived at in collaboration with the team's most effected/impacted by the shift, which just isn't my style). It was a pleasant conversation. I received a follow up a few days later indicating I didn't advance, confirming what I'd suspected. I appreciated the prompt follow up and each of my engagements with the Recruiter were very pleasant and professional. I do believe they risk losing candidates given the number of layers to their process. I understand they view this as being highly selective, but it could definitely serve as a barrier to keeping candidate's engaged in the process.