Online contest, not very easy. The after call four technical sessions were planned. Proposed to do 2 sessions or 4 sessions per day. I decided to have two sessions. It was my first interview in such company (8 years in other company). With expected result... I remember now only technical part without soft skill checks. Technical part consists from medium complexity tasks. Some task was given which should be solved step by step with interviewer. Pretty interesting idea, but... It was my first interview on foreign language
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
The task was simple but the interviewer was not very friendly.
It was the first round interview and was a Hacker rank with Easy-med leetcode qs including MCQs and fill in the blanks. 2 coding qs one was easy palindrome check.
The interview itself was easy, and the onsite seemed to go well with what sounded like positive feedback. That’s where the professionalism ended. After completing the onsite, there was no follow up and ghosted.
It’s unbelievable that a company would think this is acceptable after asking a candidate to invest significant time and effort. Ghosting after an onsite interview is disrespectful, lazy, and shows how little they value people.
Do not interview here. Total waste of time. If this is how they treat candidates, I can’t imagine how they treat employees. Never again.
I applied through other source. I interviewed at Everpure (Bengaluru) in Aug 2025
Interview
Algorithm Round or Optical Illusion Puzzle?
Had an "interesting" experience with the so-called algorithm round. Still not sure if they were testing problem-solving skills or just hoping candidates would get lost in the formatting.
The highlight was a question on a bitbuddy tree (yep, that's what they called it) disguised in a 2D array format. Looked like a scene from Inception at first glance—layers within layers. Turns out, all it required was a plain old integer division. The challenge was more in deciphering what they were even asking, not solving the problem itself.
Would’ve appreciated a bit more clarity on what kind of "algorithm" knowledge they expect. Feels like they were going for clever, but ended up closer to cryptic.
