The first interview with the recruiter was pretty standard. A bit of get to know you and problem solving questions (clock one). The second interview was a waste of time due to their format/approach. They showed up late (no apology, fwiw) and then we spent the majority of the interview talking through my history, starting with my University time. This was totally irrelevant imo - nobody goes to University to become an Implementation Consultant. Why did we need to spend 15+ minutes talking about it?? Then they asked about my working history, but mostly about why I applied at certain companies, why I left, what I liked. No questions about what I actually did though. They said they thought going through a candidate's history that way gave them a better picture but for me it was a waste of time to spend so much focus on irrelevant history. I would have loved to tell them about my relevant work experience but never had an opportunity. Red flags all around from this second interview.