The interview process felt highly disorganized, involving frequent rescheduling and an inconsistent flow between remote calls and the onsite meeting (following an NDA). The technical questions were fairly standard, not overly rigorous. The interviews often felt rushed, and I got the distinct impression that interviewers were simply checking boxes, rather than genuinely listening to and engaging with my detailed responses.
The overall tone of the company seemed to prioritize academic and research experience heavily. For instance, questions and technical discussions revealed a perceived lack of strategy for cost-optimized product design. When I offered industry advice or alternative approaches, there was a marked unwillingness to collaborate or consider suggestions, which felt like a significant red flag regarding their openness to external expertise.
I felt there was a clear bias toward research-oriented solutions, and the interviewers often minimized or questioned the value of my applied, industry-specific experience. The company culture came across as quite insular, which created a condescending atmosphere during several exchanges
