What is working from home like at Novo Nordisk?

Good environment, multiple facilities, work from home, flexible work hours

Workload, salary negotiation process, work life balance

As a fresher initial salary would be good. Culture ethics work life balance work from home flexibility. Job security. Learning opportunities. Stocks share. Extra perks and monetary benefits on extra workings.

Slow growth. Salary not competitive to market after 4 years experience in pharmacovigilance. Other domains like CDM/ RA/ MEDICAL AFFAIRS etc are having an attractive pay

- Opportunities to grow - Great colleagues - Good benefits - Social Events

There are big differences from team to team in terms of the competence of the managers, the time flexibility (office or wfh) and the importance of diversity and inclusion. I would like to elaborate on the last point in particular, as I think Novo is still at the very beginning in terms of D&I, especially at CPH headquarters. D&I should not only be about age and nationality, but we should also hire more neurodiverse people and give them the opportunity to feel valued and comfortable. In my first two teams this worked wonderfully, but in my current team the opposite is true. Unfortunately, I also feel that some younger (female) employees are sometimes underestimated and that managers can be quite biased towards them. Another disadvantage is the fast pace of work and the generally high expectations which can lead to burnout.

A hybrid, flexible WFH model empowers employees with choice, boosts satisfaction and productivity, reduces overhead costs, supports sustainability through less commuting, ensures business continuity during disruptions, balances collaboration with focused work, and fosters an inclusive environment for diverse needs.

Hybrid, flexible WFH models can also have cons such as internal politics becoming more visible, poor leadership struggling to manage distributed teams, and biased decisions that create unfairness between remote and in‑office employees

Large Company Great benefits Decent salery

Large number of “small kings” managers expected to work more than the contract states. Most of team are overworked Little to no work from home Very conservative organisation

Benefits, company culture, compensation (full package, not just salary)

Not the most flexible with work from home arrangements. Long work days.

Used to be a great place to work

Mass layoffs Less work flexibility (no work from home policy)

Good work space and Location

too much work pressure and no work from home

It used to be a great 4.5 star company before the stock crash and CEO change. You can work from home on weekends.

Leadership completely lacks vision and flexibility. Our new CEO has been here for a year, and the only changes we’ve seen are the results of his impulsive reactions. This includes hasty 'copycat' layoffs to boost short-term finances, paired with a demoralizing push for a five-day, mandatory in-office workweek.

sallary, work from home, people

too much people, bad communication