Learning Jungle Reviews

2.9

39% would recommend to a friend

(41 total reviews)

38% positive business outlook

Learning Jungle has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 41 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Learning Jungle employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

41 reviews
1.0
7 Jun 2018

Learning Jungle Phnom Penh.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The best part of working at Learning Jungle was to live in Phnom Penh and the wonderful students.

Cons

- Do not believe any of the teacher's reviews you are sent by e-mail from admin (if you ever ask) or the review you see on the school's website. Those reviews were mandatory for foreign staff and teachers were not getting their final paycheck if they wouldn't submit a review. On top of that, teachers are not getting a professional reference letter by a supervisor or coordinator. The reference letter is from an HR member who has no knowledge of education and have not been in our classroom once all year. - The 10 000$ fee if you break the contract should say enough - The administration will not help with any behavioural case in our classes and will even push to 31 students in a class (maximum should be 30) - The school has a very secretive culture and has major communication issues within the team. - Cameras with audio in classes are not there for the security of students and teachers... - No trust towards teachers : teachers are excluded from official meetings (supposedly because it is Khmer although it is Canadian school) office makes decisions despite the fact that they all have degrees in management and business and no one has an education degree. Conclusions are put without the agreement of teachers and all of our professional input is discarded. - Teachers are not allowed to speak to parents directly. So much misunderstanding happen from this and the office also distorts information to the parents /teachers, decides not to share information to parents/teachers, or has complete misunderstanding of teacher's comments. Sometimes the office members are so scared of the parents that they will just agree to everything they say without realizing that they would disrupt the classroom's internal structure. - Exploitation of Khmer assistants and cleaners. - Students in Kindergarten have to do 2 worksheets per subject a day. There is no focus and value on hands-on and playing and inquiry based learning.

1.0
16 Jul 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- student levels are based on ability, not actual age so the classes are a bigger mix of age groups (Different from Canadian/USA system) - students are generally very inquisitive and quick to learn (because they teach lower curriculum to fit the younger student maturity level) - 3-4 adults per class of 25-35 students (NOT all are ECE or OCT as advertised)

Cons

- Only one upper grade class of Grade 3. (No classes for students under grade 3) - No upper management in the education field (Top priority is profits not student achievement) - Advertisement says that the teachers... "meet and often exceed the necessary qualifications required for licensed childcare centres; with each room having a qualified E.C.E. (Early Childhood Educator). " The truth was that only 1 of the 4 teachers was ECE or a Canadian certified teacher or who simply smoke was a native English speaker (They did not all have the necessary and experience to be leading a class of over 28 Kindergarten students with 3 staff that speak minimal English. - Eminent threats with the labour ministry to lock us up if we left our contract. (3 different employees) - Eminent threats of paying over $10,000 USD for breaking a contract that is vagued and only protects them. (4 employees) - They can/will fire you for any questions that they seem inappropriate. - Will be fired if you ask for a smaller than 31 class size for Grade 1 - Will be fired if you ask about the School's REAL accreditation.

1.0
10 Dec 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- very flexible time off virtually any time during contract (your Khmer assistants cover for you) - many vacation days relative to U.S. working culture - generous payscale relative to other local employers - good work/life balance - time out of the classroom during the day allows teachers to accomplish administrative tasks during school hours and leave on time.

Cons

- decisions are made by an administrative team with no educational qualifications. Priorities include operational efficiency and attracting customers (parents) - not the interests of the children. Decisions are never made based on best practices or research in the field of education. - cold, hierarchical management structure with no trust for or investment in employees- though located right down the hall, you are prohibited from approaching the owner-operators without going through chain-of-command. There is an inefficient and bureaucratic procedure governing every workplace task. - not all foreign teachers have home country certification and most have little prior teaching experience. Virtually 100% foreign teacher turnover from year-to-year. - communication between teachers and parents is tightly monitored and regulated (e.g., you're not allowed to send notes home without office approval) - ECE class sizes can exceed 30 students (all ELLs) in extremely limited space. - the foreign teachers are excused during parts of the day to accomplish administrative tasks, which is convenient for the teacher but means the children's primary English models are the classroom assistants, some of whose English proficiency is elementary at best. - children are herded into the next grade level with limited concern for their English proficiency, maturity level or academic performance - primary driver is age. - "library" has no librarian and is stocked with Reading A-Z books printed from a laser printer, textbooks are unauthorized copies, very few books around the school in general - little investment in literacy-based tools. - The Khmer assistant teachers, mainly young, unmarried women, perform the vast majority of management, school-home coordination and organizational tasks, including needing to substitute for teachers, but are severely underpaid and un-respected for the work they do. I felt complicit in workplace exploitation. - no policies in place to address suspected child abuse at home, no formal relationships with diagnostic and treatment specialists for managing learning and behavioral disorders.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 41 Reviews

Glassdoor has 41 Learning Jungle reviews submitted anonymously by Learning Jungle employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Learning Jungle is right for you.