employer cover photo
employer logo

Nice company to work for but not perfect - Senior Staff Scientist AER Employee Review

3.0
10 Mar 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Smart and motivated co-workers - Interesting projects related to environmental challenges facing society

Cons

- Compensation is lower than possible for education and work experience - Vesting for the 401k is not great as it takes 6 years to be fully vested and the match is only 75% of what you contribute up to 6% of your salary. This is convoluted. - Issues with funding for projects led to several layoffs that affected morale

Explore other reviews about AER

5.0
22 Oct 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexibility. Freedom to do self-directed research in the field. Time to develop as a scientist. Working with modern problems in space weather. Interesting topics and problems. Safe work environment. Extremely nice and intelligent peers and colleagues. A community of devoted scientists.

Cons

The pay is low. Raises are rare.

3.0
9 Oct 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Top-notch science. Smart co-workers. Family friendly (flexible hours, kid's holiday party with gifts). Good benefits (no or low health deductibles, 401k match, ESOP through parent company). Accomplishments are acknowledged and highlighted in company meetings. Hybrid of academia and corporate worlds.

Cons

Low pay (10 to 20% below market). Large raises (greater than 3%) only if you threaten to quit with another job offer. Accomplishments are not rewarded (Employees of the year only get a paper certificate in a plastic frame). Company is completely reliant on government contracts (essentially a consulting company) so if there are no new contracts in the pipeline, your job is not secure. They have not been able to replace the "big" contract that is winding down. Therefore there is little to no opportunity for growth and promotions (company isn't growing and upper management rarely turns over). Support departments (HR, Finance, IT) are understaffed, overworked and treated as disposable and easily replaceable (they are seen as overhead or cost centers as opposed to being positioned as a corporate resource). Decision making often based upon cost, not upon needs. Traditional old school inflexible top down corporate management and culture. Little to no formal training available.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All