Strong Process, But Final Round Lacked Professionalism interviewed for a senior marketing position. The overall interview structure was clear and organized and the initial conversations were professional, thoughtful, and well-aligned with the role’s requirements. However, the final round felt inconsistent with the earlier experience. The interviewer kept the camera off, citing technical issues, which made the discussion less transparent and impersonal. Despite sending follow-up questions (as requested) through official channels, I received no acknowledgment or closure even after several weeks. The company’s hiring process overall appears structured, but the final-stage experience suggests inconsistency in candidate engagement and communication standards. Candidates should be aware that not every interviewer reflects the organization’s brand values equally. Timely feedback, basic courtesy, and transparent communication would go a long way in improving the candidate experience. Key takeaways for candidates: Always confirm video readiness before the meeting; if there are technical issues, request a reschedule for fairness. Document your follow-ups professionally; if there’s no reply within a week, move on. Don’t internalize silence, hiring outcomes often depend on individual discretion rather than performance. It’s a respected brand with great structure, but the consistency of interviewer professionalism could use real improvement.